Diversity and inclusivity in a company has to start from the top down in order to truly impact an organisation, and that means taking a look at your board of directors. Homogeneous board composition is not going to work in 2022, not only because it signals your nonprofit or business is behind the times, but also because it’s just bad business, and facilitates an unhealthy culture.
A 2019 McKinsey analysis found that companies in the top quartile for gender diversity on executive teams were 25% more likely to have above-average profitability than companies in the fourth quartile. The same analysis found companies with higher percentages of women executives outperformed companies without gender diversity in leadership. When it comes to ethnic or cultural diversity, McKinsey found more top-quartile companies outperformed those in the fourth quartile by 36% profitability.
Depending on the industry your company is in, diversity can look like many things – there’s diversity of age, thought, ethnicity, gender, experience and so on. But if your board is looking a bit too male, pale and stale, and you recognize that it’s time to change, here’s a good framework to consider…
Boards, particularly those that have had the same members or same types of members for years, should really examine their potential blindspots. They can start by looking at their community, employee and customer base, comparing this to the demographics of those who are leading the company’s strategy and values. Who is going to be the voice for each of the key stakeholders around the board table?
Anecdata is not data. If you think just because you haven’t personally witnessed discrimination faced by women or minority groups, or because your wife or secretary tells you they don’t have issues, that it doesn’t exist, you’re being willfully ignorant.
Make sure your board spends some time actually learning about the issues members of diverse populations face so that you can cultivate some compassion and have an understanding of how daunting it might be for a new board member to join a sea of the same faces. It might also help you be more empathetic to why there are fewer opportunities for diverse peoples.
Having strong leadership in this space is the key to making change. Aris says whoever is chairing the board or the nominations committee has to be the champion of diversity.
“We have to be really careful with concepts like diversity of thought, because I sometimes feel it can be used as a cop out,” says Telfer. “Organisations will say ‘we may all look the same and come from similar backgrounds but it’s fine because we all think differently.’ On one level that’s correct because no two people think exactly the same, but is the thinking amongst board members really that different?”
If you’re genuine about diversity of thought, you need to break it down. What could someone of a different generation bring to the table? What thinking can arise from experience in a different sector? Do we need more conservative thinking or more ambitious or creative ways of thinking?
Objective measurement, ideally done by an external professional, is the key to genuine diversity of thought. This starts with measuring the thinking around the current board table. Once you’ve put your board members into thought categories, it will be easier to measure and determine if someone new is going to bring true diversity of thought or just reinforce the type of thinking that’s already around the table.
Some organisations are slower or more reluctant to diversify because they operate in conservative sectors, like agriculture or insurance. Those are tougher nuts to crack, but diversity is still important because it could help move the needle towards greater market reach for that company.
Telfer says a good way to encourage those types of boards to diversify is to showcase other organisations that are similar to them that have made that step and the benefits it’s brought.
Succession planning is a strategy for helping to determine what the future leaders of your organisation will look like, and this is a good chance to examine some of those blindspots and make a plan for the types of diverse candidates you’d like to see on the board.
This will help your organisation stay in tune with what’s happening out in the broader marketplace.
You know you’re being tokenistic if you pat yourself on the back for hiring one woman and call it a job well done.
Aris recently joined the board of BNK and said they brought in three new directors in quick succession. Each of those new directors was diverse.
This is an unhelpful and regressive way of thinking. You can 100 percent have both, often because the talent is available for the best person for the role to also be the person with the most diverse background or perspective.
If you have made intentional moves to bring on more diverse board members, you might be feeling a bit nervous about the transition. Maybe you’re worried they’ll feel like a token, even if that’s not your intention. Aris says just to be your kind selves.
Women in the workplace have had to adjust the way they dress, act and behave to suit the male-dominated world. They’re often looked down upon for talking about their kids, there is rarely childcare available at offices and there is generally less flexibility in scheduling. For women to want to join more board rooms, board rooms need to become more accommodating not just to women, but to parents.
Part of the structural issues in boards that just recycle the same types of people is the fact that there are simply less opportunities given to women. Boards can help fix this by allocating funds towards programs that train women and other people of diverse backgrounds so that the board has access to a greater talent pool.